overview
SimpCity is often described as an online forum built around adult material, though the label doesn’t quite capture its breadth. By late 2025 it reportedly counted more than a million registered users, though the exact number can be hard to verify. What is clear is that activity levels were high, with threads running into the hundreds of thousands.
forum structure
At its most basic, SimpCity is a forum divided into boards. Categories cover subscription services such as OnlyFans, Patreon, and ManyVids. Other sections include TikTok reposts, discussions about celebrities, cosplay sets, and animated media. Certain boards appear to have developed regional followings, for instance those centered on Brazilian content.
The forum itself does not host files. Members share links that point outward to file-hosting services, some of which are short-lived. Over time, tagging and search tools became central to navigation. A cloud of the most popular tags—admittedly an old-fashioned interface—lets users track specific performers or niche interests.
growth and activity
Between 2024 and 2025, membership rose sharply. By September 2025, counts circulated of more than a million users and tens of thousands of active discussions. Some of these numbers are self-reported and may be inflated, but activity spikes were visible across archived posts. Growth was driven, at least in part, by demand for leaked subscription content, a form of access that had obvious appeal for people unwilling to pay creators directly.
controversies
From early on, the site attracted attention for hosting or linking to non-consensual material. That fact is not really in dispute. The harder question has been the degree of responsibility the administrators carry, since most of the content is uploaded or linked by users. Moderation has been uneven, and the sheer scale of new threads—thousands appearing daily—makes complete oversight unlikely.
Regulatory interest has grown. Governmental bodies in several jurisdictions have reportedly looked into SimpCity’s practices, especially around data protection frameworks such as the GDPR in Europe or CCPA in California. It is unclear, though, how much progress those inquiries have made.
moderation and policy
Efforts at moderation have taken different forms. Automated tools are deployed, though they miss a great deal. Human moderators intervene on obvious cases, but reports from users suggest that enforcement is patchy. Community mechanisms such as reporting, warnings, or temporary bans are visible, but they have not stemmed the volume of questionable material.
Over time the administrators have spoken of clearer rules, stricter privacy measures, and stronger reporting channels. Whether these steps are adequate remains an open question. The tension lies in balancing a large, mostly anonymous user base with the legal and ethical risks that come from distributing material that should not be online in the first place.
